Is a Maserati Quattroporte Sport GT S a good daily driver proposition?

bigbob

Member
Messages
8,973
That's still £20k in depreciation in two years which will hurt. What about buying a used new shape M5? Could be cheaper.
 

Parisien

Moderator
Messages
34,927
Well, its nice to have choices, nicer if you don't mind taking a big hit over 2/3 yrs, but a used Maser 4/5 yrs old a good buy in many ways


P
 

mondie

Member
Messages
262
That's still £20k in depreciation in two years which will hurt. What about buying a used new shape M5? Could be cheaper.

You would still burn 20k that way on a 2011 M5 which can be had for 45k by the time you pay RFL, increased servicing costs and wear items like brakes, extend the warranty etc. It would be a tough sell once the market is flooed by the hundreds of cheap M5s'coming off contract hire by mid 2015. You lose not matter what. i dont mind losing 20k over 2 yrs by the time I get tax breaks and a company fueld car its pretty painless.

You only live once
 

hodroyd

Member
Messages
14,150
I thought my comment would stir a few senses..!! The drive I had in an "M" was quick, but sitting in it was a bit like sitting in a plastic coated Ford, they just don't have anything that interesting about the interior, you could be in anything..!!
 

Andyk

Member
Messages
61,384
I think you have to drive one to appreciate it. The new DCT box makes the CC feel positively archaic!

It does......I drive a friends brand new Golf GTD with the DCT gearbox and that made the CC feel like a relic to be honest...They have come a long way.
 

Andyk

Member
Messages
61,384
I thought my comment would stir a few senses..!! The drive I had in an "M" was quick, but sitting in it was a bit like sitting in a plastic coated Ford, they just don't have anything that interesting about the interior, you could be in anything..!!

What was it Rob....Always felt the E60 M5 interior was a bit like that.......The new car is OK inside to be honest but I don't think it looks that good from the outside......They do have presence when up close but the QP GTS winds hands down for me looks wise....
 

Elliott653

Member
Messages
1,241
When I bought my '06 QP at the tail end of 2012, I had a straight choice between that or an M5. The sensible choice for what I wanted to use the car for - long journeys with the family, dog and luggage - was the BMW. It would do everything I wanted it to do with ease.

It's just that after my two years with a 4200CC, I had to have the Maserati. They have a special cache that can't possibly be matched by the M5. Nor most other saloons for that matter. To be honest, as things currently stand, I cannot ever see myself without a Masser somewhere in my life.
 

bigbob

Member
Messages
8,973
It does......I drive a friends brand new Golf GTD with the DCT gearbox and that made the CC feel like a relic to be honest...They have come a long way.

You are spot on. My test drive in an old shape M5 lasted a very short period of time as the gearbox was pants IMHO.
 

Contigo

Sponsor
Messages
18,376
SMG III takes alot to get used to , lift off during gear change (paddle) and being at the sweet spot of 3k rpm but I would say it is no worse than a CC box. The DCT however on the new F10 M5 is in a different league, lightning quick and smooth too. Accelerating through the gears makes it feel like one long gear so seamless are the changes!
 

bigbob

Member
Messages
8,973
I agree about the SMG vs CC, that's why I owned a manual 4200 but I am in a minority of Maserati owners! I think that SMG/CC cars would have sold better if the gearboxes had been better mind.
 

Contigo

Sponsor
Messages
18,376
Old tech in a nice new car and for me the Auto 3200 is just like an old slush box. I took the 6 speed manual and love it, so easy to control once you get used to it. This RR day will be interesting as it may show how different the torque curves are on the auto and manual 3200's.
 

BennyD

Sea Urchin Pate
Messages
15,008
I find the CC gearbox to be perfectly good. The changes are quick and gives an interruption in power similar to a manual change (albeit quicker). If you want a DCT gearbox all well and good but I, for one, don't. The DCT in Ryan's Golf was very good but so seamless it was too clinical. Interesting to note that in the 458 and Cali the engineers put a glitch in the software so you know you have changed gear and interacted with the car. Also, I dont understand why the people who don't like the CC gearbox prefer the manual; IMO, the CC changes are quicker, more positive and easier to do on track so what does the manual give you that the CC doesn't?
 

Contigo

Sponsor
Messages
18,376
I liked my SMG and the CC is not too far off. It was awful in Auto mode and that is my only complaint. It was unintelligent and changed sooooo sllloooooowly that it made city driving a major chore. The ONLY way to drive the SMG was to use the manual flappy paddle mode and as I said lift off and also change at a sweet spot. The CC is pretty much the same. The SMG box actually was the fastest gear change in the World at one point matching the 360 with 250ms. If you compare it to the new DCT at 80ms it is slow but as I said fast enough for most drivers.

I love the downchange on my M5, with the cats deleted it pops, burbles and bangs as it blips the throttle automatically.
 

bigbob

Member
Messages
8,973
I think that Maserati learnt from the 4200 in that the market did not really want either gearbox. If they had put a 6 speed autobox in the car then it would have sold a lot more than it did. Problem fixed with the GranTurismo and also the MC offered for those who liked the CC in the 4200.

IIRC the only cars still sold with an clutchless manual car are the MC GranTurismo, the Pagani thing and the Aventador. Small club!
 

Andyk

Member
Messages
61,384
The SMG in my M3 CSL was a better box than the CC....The CC I like but found the changes slow compared to the M3 CSL....