I wonder what the odds are that the 17 year old minor in said case gets “Diana’d” if this goes to court?That someone he knew (Epstein) was ‘apparently dodgy’?! Epstein was convicted of trafficking a child for prostitution. There’s no ‘apparently’ about it.
Also Prince Andrew was close with Epstein, so to dismiss that as ‘he knew him’ is disingenuous. Prince Andrew was also photographed with his arm around the waist of a minor who has provided plenty of corroborated evidence that she was effectively and underage sex slave (and has claimed that PA was one of her rapists), at a party at one of Epstein’s properties.
It seems like enough evidence to conclude that PA should at least be investigated for it.