Epstein

Wattie

Member
Messages
2,472
Don't believe everything that is reported

I mean a few years ago they said the MMR jab causes autism.
I don’t but there must be something behind the NY FD announcement as it’s pretty controversial. They’re gonna look a little silly if they can’t back it up
 

Wattie

Member
Messages
2,472
Back to Epstein.
Prince Andrew is apparantly appalled at the Epstein allegations.
Even though he knew back in the day that he was a registered convicted sex offender/paedophile and maintained a friendship with him.

So not that appalled then.
No smoke without fire.
 

rossyl

Member
Messages
2,529
Back to Epstein.
Prince Andrew is apparantly appalled at the Epstein allegations.
Even though he knew back in the day that he was a registered convicted sex offender/paedophile and maintained a friendship with him.

So not that appalled then.
No smoke without fire.
Any evidence that he knew?
 

midlifecrisis

Moderator
Messages
6,932
You can find coincidences anywhere.
The 27 club is one based on rock stars who died at 27 years of age. Many others died at other ages but is this a plot by the powers that be to kill off the good ones.

The 'best' conspiracy theory was one the sun ran about the cast of Dad's Army in the 80's, saying that it was a cursed cast as the main characters were mostly dead by 1985. Since they were in their 50/60/70's so natural causes has a lot to do with it.
 

Wattie

Member
Messages
2,472
Any evidence that he knew?
Well he should have given the court case and prior conviction. He is after all royalty and I would have thought the people he associates with are subject to some checks.

There are also the allegations against him, in recent court filings which deserve investigation - do they not, having resurfaced after 4 years.
 
Last edited:

rossyl

Member
Messages
2,529
Well he should have given the court case and prior conviction. He is after all royalty and I would have thought the people he associates with are subject to some checks. There are also the allegations against him, in recent court filings which deserve investigation do they not.
Understood.
The evidence is that he has not been convicted and no hard evidence has been reported, but he possibly could or might have done something... some people think. That assertion is based on the fact that he knew someone,and that someone was apparently dodgy, and he as an acquaintance of suspected dodgy person might possibly mean that he is also dodgy.

But for you, that means that he is dodgy.

Got it.
 

Wattie

Member
Messages
2,472
Understood.
The evidence is that he has not been convicted and no hard evidence has been reported, but he possibly could or might have done something... some people think. That assertion is based on the fact that he knew someone,and that someone was apparently dodgy, and he as an acquaintance of suspected dodgy person might possibly mean that he is also dodgy.

But for you, that means that he is dodgy.

Got it.
No for me it suggests that there is a possibility that he is not telling the truth.
He’s innocent until proven guilty.
There is also the possibility that his accuser is telling the truth.
That deserves to be investigated.
The law change outlined in this article means we may get to find out. It’s worth a read, lots of settled out of court pleas etc...
 

lifes2short

Member
Messages
1,872
seen many programs and articles about kennedy assassination and it's still a mystery, but the one that one that works for me is that the fatal shot was an accident by one of his bodyguards in the trailing car and covered up
 

CatmanV2

Member
Messages
30,111
seen many programs and articles about kennedy assassination and it's still a mystery, but the one that one that works for me is that the fatal shot was an accident by one of his bodyguards in the trailing car and covered up
How would that work without a large exit wound in his face? (Only slightly curious)

C
 

breezer

Junior Member
Messages
93
Understood.
The evidence is that he has not been convicted and no hard evidence has been reported, but he possibly could or might have done something... some people think. That assertion is based on the fact that he knew someone,and that someone was apparently dodgy, and he as an acquaintance of suspected dodgy person might possibly mean that he is also dodgy.

But for you, that means that he is dodgy.

Got it.
That someone he knew (Epstein) was ‘apparently dodgy’?! Epstein was convicted of trafficking a child for prostitution. There’s no ‘apparently’ about it.

Also Prince Andrew was close with Epstein, so to dismiss that as ‘he knew him’ is disingenuous. Prince Andrew was also photographed with his arm around the waist of a minor who has provided plenty of corroborated evidence that she was effectively and underage sex slave (and has claimed that PA was one of her rapists), at a party at one of Epstein’s properties.

It seems like enough evidence to conclude that PA should at least be investigated for it.
 

CatmanV2

Member
Messages
30,111
mother of all conspiracy theories, second shooter, cia, mafia involvement, unlikely Oswald managed to get the fatal shot from all the available info???
So people not liking a version of the truth makes it a mystery. People really are fascinating.

C
 

midlifecrisis

Moderator
Messages
6,932
You mean it's not flat?! That would be why cats haven't pushed everything off the edge!
C
Other proof that the world is not flat is that if a dog barks in one neighbourhood, another responds close by and so on until the original dog barks again due to it responding to a bark from the other direction.

#FACT #ENDOF #PERIOD