How come so many doctors and nurses ended up on ventilators? Bus drivers, dustmen. These are not elderly people. My husband was hospitalised. You really do talk a load of offensive rubbish!
Viral load, improper ppe. Lack of knowledge re virus given its newness. Terrible government preparation. Open borders.
Pre existing health conditions, obesity, smokers, no health or fitness regime.
They were unlucky.
Yes, we know all of these are a factor in both catching the disease and the severity of the experience. So what? You seem to be suggesting that there are 'good reasons' (including bad luck) why some people get ill or die, and the subtext seems to be that without these 'reasons' there is no problem. This is a common delusion; a defensive mechanism to try to create a sense of being safe.
For example fighter pilots are strangely inclined to blame pilot error when one of their number dies, because it is more comfortable to imagine that, 'he died, because he made a mistake, but I won't' than to think, 'I might die like that at any moment'. Same thing drives 'comforting' conspiracy theories - 'If 9/11 was a complex government plot, then I can make sense of it, but if it was a handful of random terrorists, I'm going to be afraid all the time.'
There is also the comfort of imagining that one has special knowledge of 'the facts' and so is insulated from uncomfortable turbulence and uncertainty.
I suspect (but may be wrong) that part of what drives the ideas for many people that 'it just affects old, obese, smokers' or 'the government wasn't prepared' or even 'we must open up to save the economy' is really a slightly delusional attempt to say 'there isn't really a deadly global pandemic that we actually have to deal with'.
Assuming this is a question (a little ambiguous without the correct punctuation); no you really don't.
I think many of us look at the data and try to draw conclusions. It seems to me that the data are sufficiently ambiguous and inconclusive that only a propagandist, someone deluded or someone seeking the lifeboat of spurious certainty would claim to know the 'facts'.
Again, assuming this is a question; I would say certainly offensive, and mostly inaccurate through a mixture of bad data and flawed logic.