Thanks for all the feedback particularly to those that tried to help with my question. Others here seem to be getting upset as to why I would even dare ask about the lowest depreciating model for my money, and then have psycho-analysed my post making the leap that therefore I would be the type of buyer that they don't feel should be allowed to buy a Maserati. Amazing quite frankly ! I had said that I wanted a "good one" and not a "cheap one", and it was not even a very long post that I made, so not sure how some of you got to the conclusions that I wouldn't be a good custodian for a Maserati. Some type of Syndrome perhaps.
Thanks again to those that are helping with their knowledge.
Jess I wasn’t being obtuse and I certainly didn’t at any point suggest that anyone shouldn’t be allowed to buy a Maserati.
I was however pretty blunt in my suggestions (4.7’s or nothing) which I stand by. The GS as good as it may be is imo lacking which is why many try to bung on this that and the other to get them to sound like the above. Drive them - you’ll understand.
If you look around this forum you will soon discover that part of the charm of Maserati (the charm is bewitching by the way) is that they are often described as “tempremental mistresses”.
This charm includes perfectly working cars one day to cars refusing to do anything the next.
Batteries constantly cause problems, electrical gremlins are known, suspension issues exist, corrosion can be concerning. Etc etc
I stand by my suggestion -you buy one for fun..... perceived depreciation is nothing compared to running costs and a repair.
A bill from any Maserati, even the one with perfect history etc can run to thousands.
Many on here say a GS wil, depreciate less.....who knows, They’re all heading south at the moment.
Enjoy your search but do so aware of the pitfalls.