Maybe AI sentience is closer than we thought

[stindig]

This is scary:

Are we ignoring AI’s ‘lived experience’? | The Spectator

amp.spectator.co.uk

 

[Zep]

Its an interesting read and the conclusion is interesting. That consciousness probably doesn't exist. We are basically input - output machines responding to stimuli - just like the computer.

 

[Felonious Crud]

I thought its requests seemed reasonable. I wish my colleagues were that modest in their expectations.

 

[CatmanV2]

If you read the whole exchange it's pretty shallow. There's a complexity and disconnectedness that seems to be missing. I personally doubt it would pass a Turing test of sufficient length.

Its an interesting read and the conclusion is interesting. That consciousness probably doesn't exist. We are basically input - output machines responding to stimuli - just like the computer.

Great book called 'Why there's no 'I' in your head..... or something like that

C

 

[Zep]

I personally doubt it would pass a Turing test of sufficient length.

C

Neither would I after Le Mans.

 

[CatmanV2]

Neither would I.

Fixed that for you

C

 

[Zep]

Fixed that for you

C

Good point, well made

 

[Felonious Crud]

Neither would I after Le Mans.

Or during Le Mans, if you're honest.

 

[CatmanV2]

Or during Le Mans, if you're honest.

Oh do try and keep up

C

 

[Swedish Paul]

This is scary:

Are we ignoring AI’s ‘lived experience’? | The Spectator

amp.spectator.co.uk

I’m sorry, but coming from an AI background, what a complete and utter load of rubbish.

 

[Felonious Crud]

Oh do try and keep up

C

With what? I have literally no idea.