GS or GT??

conaero

Forum Owner
Messages
34,686
Having had both the GT boot appears much bigger. I think the floor area must be bigger but the boot not as tall. The GT boot is more useable.

As for which one to have, it's a GS or a GTS so as there is no way of having a GTS for £30k that should answer your question.

I do however think the GS is way over priced at £30k. Due to the GT hitting £30k decent low mileage GS examples should be worth £25k ranging down to late teens for poor examples but its a supply and demand thing I suppose.

100 plus GT's for sale vs 10 GS's

So based upon all of the above if you say a GS for £25k or a GT for £30k I'd go GS, if they were the same money I would advise going GT.
 

Andyk

Member
Messages
61,368
Having had both the GT boot appears much bigger. I think the floor area must be bigger but the boot not as tall. The GT boot is more useable.

As for which one to have, it's a GS or a GTS so as there is no way of having a GTS for £30k that should answer your question.

I do however think the GS is way over priced at £30k. Due to the GT hitting £30k decent low mileage GS examples should be worth £25k ranging down to late teens for poor examples but its a supply and demand thing I suppose.

100 plus GT's for sale vs 10 GS's

So based upon all of the above if you say a GS for £25k or a GT for £30k I'd go GS, if they were the same money I would advise going GT.

Spot ojn Matt......Its that 30k plus GS i really struggle with
 

halbe01

Junior Member
Messages
281
Just to throw my $0.02 in the ring here - I think the talk of relative pricing, while interesting, isn't entirely relevant to the question. Having had my 4200 for a couple of years, and then driven a GT, I found them to be hugely different cars. The 4200/GS is a much smaller car, a much more involving drive, and (for me at least) hugely more fun. It isn't as relaxing on the motorway, it's isn't as smooth as the GT either suspension or gearbox-wise (I drove a 4.7 GTS Auto), and it's not as well insulated from road/wind noise.. In fact having finished driving the GTS I came away thinking it's much more like a prettier and faster version of my 4.2 Audi A6 than a more modern version of the 4200/GS which is what I was actually looking for. It's more of a sporty QP than it is a GS replacement. So if you think of them as the difference between a 3 and 5 series BMW perhaps, I think that's more accurate than imagining a 3 series and a next generation 3 series.

So, in my opinion at least, I think you need to look at what you're after in a car first, and then work out if there is a Maz which fits the bill. And if there isn't one which matches entirely, go buy either one - they're both great and you'll not have any regrets!

Just my thoughts having driven both. My only caveat would be that I've never driven the 4.7 MC Shift which might well be a bit closer to being the spiritual successor to the GS - though of course it'll still be bigger and more isolated from the road.

Cheers,
Ben.

PS Don't count the 4200 out. If you're thinking a GS at £30k, you could also consider a really good '05 4200 at £15k or so.
 

bigbob

Member
Messages
8,973
I think the boot stats for the GranTurismo stated are for the Cabrio.

As has previously been stated, the GS and GT are very different so there is no correct answer. I think the drivers' age comment is fair (I have a GranTurismo!) as is how you will use the car. GS or GTS MC are more weekend cars, GT or GTS Auto are more daily drivers.
 

dem maser

Moderator
Messages
34,277
not much in it in terms of engine technology though is it?

the GS is the same as GT i believe but obviously a bigger car hence not as sporty to drive
 

bigbob

Member
Messages
8,973
Personally, put my GTS Auto into Sport Manual and I feel that it is an impressive piece of kit and can cover ground faster than my 4200 did as the brakes lock up less, the car rolls less and the traction is much better. However, I understand that a lot of people want a smaller car.
 

BigFoot

New Member
Messages
896
GS vs GTS is not the same as GS vs GT. The GT has a different engine compared to the GS though the actual power output is similar. Obviously, for similar money, I'd get a GTS over a GS.
 

hodroyd

Member
Messages
14,150
I think for the money I would be looking down the GS route personally. Whilst the GranTurismo is a lovely looking car, the 4.2 engine is a +5 sec unit, the 4.7 would be better, but more money again.
 
Last edited:

GhostyDog

New Member
Messages
594
I've been watching the GT prices fall over the past months, for me I think a lot of what make me choose a car is technology, yes the GS may be a more raw drivers car and at 37 I may be old before my time but I'd go for the GT for two reasons, it looks awesome and it's more up to date technology wise in my perception.

Been talking it over with the wife and my dream to own an Aston V8 Vantage by the time I'm 40 may well now be supplanted by a dream to own one of these instead.
 

Andyk

Member
Messages
61,368
PS Don't count the 4200 out. If you're thinking a GS at £30k, you could also consider a really good '05 4200 at £15k or so.

That's a very good point Ben...There is another question there....Is a 30k plus GS actually 15k plus better than a 2005 face lifted 4200.....We know that most of the GS upgrades are on a 4200 faclift......
 

conaero

Forum Owner
Messages
34,686
Supply and demand Andy, thats the only real difference GS/4200 oh, and a bit of trim, but for me, it would still be GS all the way.
 

conaero

Forum Owner
Messages
34,686
Andy, I know of one other well know forum member who is seriously eyeing that up at the moment.
 

bigbob

Member
Messages
8,973
The 2005 facelift is night and day better than a 2002 4200 in my opinion but the Market will not recognise that viz a viz GS. GS does look a lot more aggressive mind!
 

halbe01

Junior Member
Messages
281
Andy - I saw that yellow one in the flesh the other day - not my cup of tea but it certainly would turn heads!