Lets just stick to the facts rather than turning arguments around.
Max has won 9 times and had 7 2nd places. He has 3 DNF's, one caused by a tyre failure, and 2 through crashes with Hamilton, of which each got the blame for one of them. Note that when Hamilton got the blame for the crash he still won so him crashing into Max gained him 25 points. So much for comments about Max taking his opponent out. Max has one other bad result (9th) in Hungary where Bottas crashed in to him without fault. I'm not sure where you see the mistakes but I'm open to hear.
Then Hamilton: 7 wins but not as many DNF's. On some of those wins he had help from Bottas (Max has had very little help from Perez until the last few races). Those times that Hamilton didn't come second either he or Mercedes made mistakes. In Azerebeijan, he botched the re-start and ended pointless. He has had a number of other off's where he was saved by the red flag so he could repair his car and get new tyres. For example Emilia Romagna, where Hamilton made a mistake, hitting the wall and damaging his front wing. After approximately a minute in the gravel, he rejoined and then the red flag came out rescuing him - he went on to finish second. So that was because of other incidents, no strategy calls or driving skills. At the Portuguese GP Hamilton won after "overtaking" Bottas. When Hamilton had a puncture he still had enough functionality to win - Max had a blow-out and went into the wall. In Turkey he could have been higher up if the pit stop strategy had been better with Martin Brundle noting that Hamilton should take responsibility for his initial pit strategy saying he should have respected the initial instructions to pit. Max has also overtaken Hamilton a few times at the start (more than the other way around).
As to top speeds: In the Sprint race, where Hamilton came from the back of the grid, his top speed was 339 km/h. Max was 22 km/h slower so I'm not sure where you get your stats from? Smoke and mirrors on your side perhaps
I don't know how Hamilton could have overtaken so many cars on the straight if he didn't have a faster car.
So I'm not sure how you could argue that Hamilton deserves it more based on this season's results. Now if you said you don't like Max and you prefer Hamilton (or you prefer a British driver) to win, that I could accept. Surely not coloured glasses?