Phil H
Member
- Messages
- 4,346
For a hybrid design you start with an ICE car whose manufacture has a given carbon footprint, then add the EV components which inevitably add to that footprint. Conversely, when in EV driving mode it's not presumably creating as much pollution as when the ICE engine is running. Cost-wise, there's usually a premium for hybrid over ICE (notwithstanding purchase incentives which skew the figures).
I wonder if anyone has done the sums to show which, in the life of the a car, is really cheapest to own and which is actually best for the planet (including end of life disposal) - hybrid or ICE?
As much as I appreciate the argument about EV (home) charging costs I can't help but wonder if hybrid manufacture is more about marketing than altruism, and given recent concerns about massive pollution from the mining of rare metals used in EV battery production is it sustainable in the long term?
I wonder if anyone has done the sums to show which, in the life of the a car, is really cheapest to own and which is actually best for the planet (including end of life disposal) - hybrid or ICE?
As much as I appreciate the argument about EV (home) charging costs I can't help but wonder if hybrid manufacture is more about marketing than altruism, and given recent concerns about massive pollution from the mining of rare metals used in EV battery production is it sustainable in the long term?