Morning all.
I haven't bought shares directly in years. When I was investing, it was in four or five figure lumps.
Into businesses that I knew well, perhaps as a consumer and where I had some understanding of
the market, looking out several months. I was also much less risk averse then, than I am now
Right now, I'd be looking at the US drug companies that are running early trials of a potential cure
to COVID19. Risky obviously. But there are only a few companies and I'd suggest that the U.S. government
will be under heavy pressure to back at least one U.S. company, because of the massive imbalance in where
pharmaceuticals are produced. Mostly China. This imbalance has been flagged as a national security issue
by the US govt. Belatedly.
To balance the above, if I was holding gold, bought at its low point over the past year or so, I might take
some profits, but I'd mostly stay with gold and perhaps one or two other rare metals used in telecoms and/or
defence for example and whose risky supply chains end in China or other countries in Asia / Africa, where
the response to COVID19 is likely to be poor. I watched part of Trump's press conference late last night until
I had to switch off. A few things became clear to me, in the course of the press conference.
Trump is distancing himself from the issue, in appointing his VP to take charge. This is poor leadership and shows that Trump wants to get as far away from this issue, as fast as he can, despite the limitations to do so, because of the necessity of being seen to be 'in charge'.
What does this mean? Based on his own briefings from the CDC etc, Trump sees no upside in this issue.
It was obvious that Trump had only the barest grasp of the issue, in comparison to the other items on his
agenda. Like terrorism and national security, or getting reelected, for instance. This is saying a lot, because he has
only surface deep knowledge in his most pressing other issues, except reelection.
Surrounding yourself with experts in their field only gets you so far. Trump's White House has had the highest turnover of senior staff in history. Obviously, he does not play well with others.
I have no confidence in his leadership ability to deal with COVID19 effectively. Nor to direct, or offer aid to other countries, of strategic importance to the U.S., to deal with COVID19 effectively.
For the above reasons and many more, I would get into or stay invested in gold or other very rare and high demand metals and stay invested. Possibly until this pandemic has run its course and that is at least a year out from now. Possibly longer. If this pandemic spreads everywhere as I expect it to, a doubling of the gold price wouldn't surprise me at all.
I heard an expert on epidemics interviewed on Radio 4's Today programme this morning. His absolute belief was that self quarantines, like what is happening in China currently, will only buy time. The virus won't pass us by, if we 'hunker down' for a few weeks. If I understood him correctly, his belief was that our fate is predetermined regarding COVID19. Our only hope is if a cure is found, before we contract it. Given the likely time frame to produce a cure, its unlikely we'll get it in time. Health workers, the police and armed forces and other essential workers will be prioritised. I find this highly depressing, because the expert I'm referring to had absolute conviction in what he was saying and it gels with what I'm hearing other experts of similar standing say.
But, all of the above relating to investing is highly speculative and of worthless value, as even my limited understanding of the markets I knew best, has evaporated over time. These are my gut feelings only
Apologies if the conversation has moved on. Two finger typing and only one coffee this morning so far, are very inhibiting