just look at the M3, you could not tell it apart from a 318D sport, the Merc has huge shiny wheels, flared arches, 4 chrome tail pipes, diffuser, deep chin spoilers and the noise is awesome, i would have a white one as well.
I can tell the new M3 from miles away .... Its the Merc I wouldn't have a clue ..... The AMG is mega fast yes but its a big bus of a car and I know which would be more fun. For me thats whats it about FUN ..
what i really dont like one the new m3 is the bonnet with that silly hump, looks like the bonnet has an erction, in terms of looks, the e92 is the worst m3 made.
Andy dont lie, look at the front of a c class sport then a c63 the difference is very clear. I think the rs4 is nicer than the m3 as well.
thats your opinion adam..i do like to think the GTS M3 is a rival for the R8 as BMW dont have a supercar so at 100k its not bad as its a better car than the 4.2 R8....
Dem the M3 GTS is not a rival for anything, is it a better car than the 4.2 R8? maybe faster than the Audi but better? probably not as you cant really use it everyday, and it is just a normal plain M3 with a crappy spoiler. If you want a track car for around £100K, you buy a GT3 RS, the best of the best of the best.
I like the GTS but it ain't worth the money they want for it ... It's the CSL all over again ... Too much new. Give it 5 years or so and it will be talked about in the same vein as the CSL I bet. It's a great car without a shadow of a doubt but over 100k is a bit much to swallow. Speaking to Chris Harris the other week he drove it for EVO and said it was brilliant but the CSL is just as good.
Well i personally wouldn't use a GTS everyday, there is only 10 coming to the U.K and i reckon straight away they will lose 30K. It maybe a great car, but it wont be remembered like the E46 CSL and E30 M3.