Can we coin a different phrase than the bat one? I've heard if you type the word bat three times in the one paragraph you might catch covid. So think yourself lucky you only said bat twice.the world didnt bat an eyelid
... Oh ****...
Can we coin a different phrase than the bat one? I've heard if you type the word bat three times in the one paragraph you might catch covid. So think yourself lucky you only said bat twice.the world didnt bat an eyelid
This video keeps getting taken down off social media. 30 minutes long and a thought inspiring video by a virologist.
PlanDemic Documentary
PlanDemic, a film about the global plan to take control of our lives, liberty, health & freedom. pandorasmouth ABOUT THE FILM Humanity is imprisoned by a killer pandemic. People are being arrested for surfing in the ocean and meditating in na…www.bitchute.com
This is Crazy if it's true.
So that first one is to do with SARS (SARS-CoV) rather than COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) and therefore not very relevant as far as I can see.So-called Coronavirus patent said:An outbreak of a virulent respiratory virus, now known as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), was identified in Hong Kong, China and a growing number of countries around the world in 2003. The invention relates to nucleic acids and proteins from the SARS coronavirus. These nucleic acids and proteins can be used in the preparation and manufacture of vaccine formulations, diagnostic reagents, kits, etc. The invention also provides methods for treating SARS by administering small molecule antiviral compounds, as well as methods of identifying potent small molecules for the treatment of SARS.
Now I'm an engineer and definitely not a doctor or a scientist, so most of that doesn't make much sense to me. The part of it that did make sense to me wasSo-called coronavirus vaccine patent said:The present invention provides a live, attenuated coronavirus comprising a variant replicase gene encoding polyproteins comprising a mutation in one or more of non- structural protein(s) (nsp)-10, nsp-14, nsp-15 or nsp-16. The coronavirus may be used as a vaccine for treating and/or preventing a disease, such as infectious bronchitis, in a subject.
Which ties up with what I have read about the Oxford Jenner Institute vaccine that's currently in human trials, in that it uses a type of virus found in Chimpanzee's that has no affect on humans and is non-replicating as a sort of means of transport for their COVID vaccine, but rather than produce whatever the virus normally produces they effectively re-programmed it to produce the "spikes" found on COVID-19 to introduce it into our bodies so we can produce antibodies without actually being infected.Patent said:The coronavirus may be used as a vaccine for treating and/or preventing a disease
Who's MC'ing todays Two Minutes Hate on behalf of the Tory Party?
Boris 'Bojo' Johnson?
Matt 'Handjob' Hancock
Dominic 'Death Warmed Up' Raab?
Or that weird bloke I can never remember the name of but is well versed in patronising....
That's the fecker!Jenrick the "I stay in three homes" person?
Interesting, just had a look around to try and fact check this a bit.
First patent he mentions that there "is a patent for coronavirus" and shows the website showing said patent.
(https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US2006257852#section=Patent-Title)
The part of the "coronavirus patent" that video doesn't show you on that exact website is this summary:
So that first one is to do with SARS (SARS-CoV) rather than COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) and therefore not very relevant as far as I can see.
Second he mentions a European patent for a "coronavirus vaccine", and again shows a website:
https://data.epo.org/gpi/EP3172319A1
Again, he doesn't show the whole website or description of a patent. Here's the description on there
Now I'm an engineer and definitely not a doctor or a scientist, so most of that doesn't make much sense to me. The part of it that did make sense to me was
Which ties up with what I have read about the Oxford Jenner Institute vaccine that's currently in human trials, in that it uses a type of virus found in Chimpanzee's that has no affect on humans and is non-replicating as a sort of means of transport for their COVID vaccine, but rather than produce whatever the virus normally produces they effectively re-programmed it to produce the "spikes" found on COVID-19 to introduce it into our bodies so we can produce antibodies without actually being infected.
(https://www.ovg.ox.ac.uk/news/covid-19-vaccine-development this probably explains it a bit better)
With that said, is this second patent quoted for using such technology, as in using a coronavirus for a vaccine rather than a patent for a coronavirus vaccine? I don't know. But I'm enjoying looking all this stuff up !
You mean it's ****, again? No offence to @philw696 but you can pretty much make that assessment from the still 'Urgent' 'This Video will be banned in 24 hours'
Just like the 'Brits are making millions and gaining financial freedom. Watch now before it's banned'
Nice research, though
C
"Father/Filmaker" as I'm not quite sure what a "Filmaker" is..
Espacenet – search results
Espacenet: free access to millions of patent documents. Find out if your invention is unique or if other inventors have filed patent applications that are considered to be prior art.worldwide.espacenet.com
Patent said:20. A vaccine comprising a coronavirus according to any of claims 1 to 12 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
Patent said:[0002] FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to an attenuated coronavirus comprising a variant replicase gene, which causes the virus to have reduced pathogenicity. The present invention also relates to the use of such a coronavirus in a vaccine to prevent and/or treat a disease.
You need an open mind. And a closed dictionary
C
Interesting, there's a bit more information on there to the one I found, although it may as well be in Swahili as I'm not even close to being able to understand the majority of it. There are some other statements on there which I can slightly comprehend that seem to point in the same direction as what I had previously interpreted, mentioning use in vaccines etc.
Those points in particular seem to tie in with what the Oxford guys are doing with their vaccine. But from what I can establish, there's no mention of it being a patent for a specific coronavirus, more so an application for using a coronavirus. But again I may be wrong !!
It's even better than that. I invite anyone taking it seriously to consider the phrase:
'Further, there is a need in the industry to develop vaccines which are suitable for use in ovo'
Particularly in light of the:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avian_coronavirus
And since it's not the OTD thread:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_ovo
effective method for vaccination of poultry against various Avian influenza and coronaviruses.
C
Oh wow... so it's for birds.
Yes. Yes it is. It's a patent for a vaccine not only against a different disease (IBV: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avian_coronavirus), but for a different genus of animals.
https://www.pirbright.ac.uk/viruses/infectious-bronchitis-virus
Whose patent it is
List the symptoms:
C
- Young chickens are depressed and huddle under the heat source
- Gasping, coughing and nasal discharge
- Drop in egg production
- Poor quality eggs; misshapen or soft-shelled eggs with watery content
- When the kidneys are affected, increased water intake, depression, scouring and wet litter are commonly observed.