Question about the self employed:
This isn’t a dig at anyone, so no shouting, just a genuine question.
Why is JC banging on about handouts for the self employed?
I work with a lot of self employed staff, their take home pay is roughly double what the permanent employees get. This extra is meant to cover pensions, sickness etc.
There have been calls for self-employed people (like me) to 'be paid what they normally get paid' (including the usual silly and typo-filled petitions). This makes no sense on many levels.
Some self-employed people are still working more-or-less successfully from home.
There seems to me no reason why 'someone' should pay 100% of what self-employed people were previously making - surely some drop in income can be tolerated when times are hard.
And where is the money supposed to be coming from? The 'rich', as usual? It can only come from 'printing more', 'tax', 'borrowing' or 'other people'.
If the proposition is 'give self-employed people all the money now' PLUS 'tax them treble next year to pay for it' maybe we wouldn't be so keen on that.
The only fun part is that if there is to be a 'free money' handout which is based on previous tax returns; the cheats who have been taking half their money in undeclared cash will be feeling a bit sorry for themselves.