Are you worried yet.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wattie

Member
Messages
8,640
And here we go again. It seems that only you can be right about pretty much everything. Even when you aren’t.

In a democracy, others are entitled to express their opinions you know without you jumping in with your opposing opinion as if it’s fact - just because you read it on zerohedge. There are plenty of far more intelligent financial experts than you, me or the folk at Zerohedge out there that disagree with your view of the financial markets and Governments’ current approach to supporting them and the economy.
Don’t remember saying u couldn’t have an opinion. I’m pretty sure that entitles me to express mine that it’s wrong.

I actually agreed with u re the balancing act.

Who are the experts you refer to?
 

lozcb

Member
Messages
12,586
And so the next step in repeating the mistakes of te last century creeps in... isolationism becomes nationalism and then wars are not far behind.

Criticising a free press which, regardless of political persuasion, seem to be less than impressed by the government's handling is also worrying.

First it was certain broadcasters or newspaper titles were accused of bias on Brexit. Fair enough, that was a polarising subject and someone might feel the 'other' side were attacking them.

But this is a common challenge across the world, and certain countries or cultures are doing a better job.

Yesterday's graph (switched back from a logarithmic scale, consistency in presenting data is paramount unless you are trying to change the narrative) shows we are still closely following Italy and, thankfully, not as bad as Spain.

But why, given the warnings we had and the opportunity to act earlier and avoid this?

It may be true that lockdown was not necessary, follow Sweden's course to see if that may have been right.

Opposition parties have to find a balance between challenging and supporting the government.

The press should be free of such concerns but are pilloried by the public for daring to challenge the government's response.

What I can see is people having jobs after all this but poorer than before with the additional taxation they will bear and still no appetite to fairly tax businesses, particularly Amazon, Starbucks etc and the wealthy.

A tithe is simple... everyone pays the same share. Tax is not. The rich have sufficient headroom in their wealth to employ someone to discover loopholes.

And so the inequality going into this year will be even more pronounced at the end, and politicians will argue better to be poor than dead. Except economies need a poor underclass that knows its place to make money for others.

And the poor will be more resentful than they were after the GFC, and there will be no more immigrants to blame after Brexit for them being poor so they will point the finger at another country for them being poor. And wars will start.

And the wealthy will look on and allow this to happen because it serves their needs.

An earlier post said not to politicise this thread, to pull together behind our government and support it, yet it is acceptable to label other countries and regimes and not scrutinise our own?

And the moral of story is ...............................................we are part of a realtime experiment..............all of us except the Chinese who are conducting it ............................the state of the economy will be the biproduct
 

Rwc13

Member
Messages
1,668
Ok, well then I’m simply going to state that I believe you are totally wrong and we’ll politely agree to differ.

And the experts are the economists and academics that support what Government’s are doing and, in general, those that support a more MMT approach to central monetary policy. But we already know you think they are totally wrong too.
 

Scaf

Member
Messages
6,612
My daughter has worked for the NHS for quite some time, she has obviously seen things and had to deal with things that she keeps to her self, tries to keep it all separate from her outside of work life. A couple of days ago I saw her really upset, not directly by the day to day grind, but by the attitude she experienced by hospital management. She complained on behalf of herself and others that they did not feel safe with the level of PPE they were being provided with. She was basically called a wimp and told that even if they were provided with an adequate amount of masks it wouldn’t make any difference anyway, they would still catch it. That’s great for the moral of those who are going the extra mile. I would not blame her or others if they just said, OK up yours, I’m going home to self isolate with my husband and kids. But they don’t, do they! It’s disgusting and hospital upper management need to get their act together. At the very least with moral support if nothing else.
My daughter is also a nurse and is having her own bad experience regarding PPE (well lack of) but equally important those in charge do not seem to know what they need so how on earth can they ensure they have it.
On Tuesday my daughter got a sore throat and running nose, she feels fine and it’s most likely just a cold.
But her manager was not sure what to do and had to make a call, she was then sent home to self isolate, no offer of a test that could have enabled her to stay at work.
 

Wattie

Member
Messages
8,640
Ok, well then I’m simply going to state that I believe you are totally wrong and we’ll politely agree to differ.

And the experts are the economists and academics that support what Government’s are doing and, in general, those that support a more MMT approach to central monetary policy. But we already know you think they are totally wrong too.
Ok.
Mmt, the latest roll of the dice by those in charge whose prior debt based solutions all failed resulting in an emergency frenzy of money printing and a complete U turn from responsible budgetary money policy.

Hilarious, if trillions will fix it can we all just create a couple of hundred trillion tomorrow and be done with it.

Senator Thomas Massie on the Us bailout.
If getting us into $6 trillion more debt doesn’t matter, then why are we not getting $350 trillion more in debt so that we can give a check of $1 million to every person in the country?”
 

Phil the Brit

Member
Messages
1,499
Care homes, Someone put me right if I am wrong here.
Most care homes are privately run places "for profit". My mums one before she died was near on £1500 per WEEK and that was a while ago.
So why on earth should British taxpayers have to fund all their PPE.
One woman on BBC this morning (who owns 14 care homes by the way) was crying out for the Government to get PPE urgently and free of charge.
Well, wasn't it her job to buy her own weeks ago?
It is just a cost of doing business surely?
 

Silvercat

Member
Messages
1,166
Unfortunately in a typically British stiff upper lip kind of way we are still playing Queensbury rules , it's time the gloves come off , as nasty a scenario as it sounds , other wise sheeple I'd brush up on your Mandarin ,ditch your Bible and start reading Mau .
I'm sure Trump has already watched this and together with the CIA and his military chiefs will be planning on his next move.
This crisis is not going to be over anytime soon.
 

Rwc13

Member
Messages
1,668
Ok.
Mmt, the latest roll of the dice by those in charge whose prior debt based solutions all failed resulting in an emergency frenzy of money printing and a complete U turn from responsible budgetary money policy.

Hilarious, if trillions will fix it can we all just create a couple of hundred trillion tomorrow and be done with it.

Senator Thomas Massie on the Us bailout.
If getting us into $6 trillion more debt doesn’t matter, then why are we not getting $350 trillion more in debt so that we can give a check of $1 million to every person in the country?”
Well MMT has been around a long time, since I think the 1970s so hardly the latest roll of the dice.

And the risk of printing unlimited money in an MMT world is inflation which you then have to control through taxation or reduced Government spending. So there is a balance to MMT policy as with any central monetary policy. You print the minimum money you need to keep the economy in growth
 

iainw

Member
Messages
3,386
Care homes, Someone put me right if I am wrong here.
Most care homes are privately run places "for profit". My mums one before she died was near on £1500 per WEEK and that was a while ago.
So why on earth should British taxpayers have to fund all their PPE.
One woman on BBC this morning (who owns 14 care homes by the way) was crying out for the Government to get PPE urgently and free of charge.
Well, wasn't it her job to buy her own weeks ago?
It is just a cost of doing business surely?
I would agree with this. Private profit making institutions and public health care establishments should be different. They could buy it and claim tax back as a Business expense. It’s just like hard hats for a private building company
 

Phil H

Member
Messages
4,182
Care homes, Someone put me right if I am wrong here.
Most care homes are privately run places "for profit". My mums one before she died was near on £1500 per WEEK and that was a while ago.
So why on earth should British taxpayers have to fund all their PPE.
One woman on BBC this morning (who owns 14 care homes by the way) was crying out for the Government to get PPE urgently and free of charge.
Well, wasn't it her job to buy her own weeks ago?
It is just a cost of doing business surely?
We've had three close relatives in care homes over the years and the costs were eyewatering, and as you say they are run for profit. One of the owners tried (but failed) to increase my aunt's fees by 14% and said that funding had been cut for his council funded residents so he had to make up the shortfall from those who were self funded. We had a deep and meaningful debate which he lost, but it was notable that he and his wife each had new BMW's every year and opened a second care home.

PH
 

Wattie

Member
Messages
8,640
Well MMT has been around a long time, since I think the 1970s so hardly the latest roll of the dice.

And the risk of printing unlimited money in an MMT world is inflation which you then have to control through taxation or reduced Government spending. So there is a balance to MMT policy as with any central monetary policy. You print the minimum money you need to keep the economy in growth
Sounds easy.
They’ll **** it up, inflation will abound.
 

Rwc13

Member
Messages
1,668
Sounds easy.
They’ll **** it up, inflation will abound.
And yet some Governments/EU have been adopting this kind of approach for around a decade and inflation in many countries has been kept at or near an all time low........
 

Zep

Moderator
Messages
9,302
At least it’s not a pay increase, but you would think that the £26k a year they can already claim might cover it. I would hope they don’t abuse it ;)
 

2b1ask1

Special case
Messages
20,284
If you follow it down did you also note that they pushed through a relaxation of the 'proof' they need to show for said expenses (not just the special measures)!
 

Contigo

Sponsor
Messages
18,376
Well one boomer (lol first time I can actually use this rather than have it directed at me!) has already cried off so won't be long until they are all upset. Amazing how self-righteousness and pride can get in the way on forums isn't it! :D

The "chip on shoulder" generation they should be referred to as.
 

Wattie

Member
Messages
8,640
And yet some Governments/EU have been adopting this kind of approach for around a decade and inflation in many countries has been kept at or near an all time low........
Well it depends how they fiddle inflation ie
exclude house prices, goods get smaller for the same price, shrinkflation etc etc
 
Status
Not open for further replies.