vanman1936
Junior Member
- Messages
- 77
I think that's my mid term plan also (MC Strad and a 458 or Macca 570). Mate has offered me his California for a decent price.....quite tempted. What does the 30 add to the mix?
Strad faster than a 997 GT3. How?!
Thats an impressive feat. and only .2 slower than an F430
Strad faster than a 997 GT3. How?!
Thats an impressive feat. and only .2 slower than an F430
I had just noted that 0.2 as well. incredible! that was an earlier 2 seater, also. It obviously pushed out more horses than it says on the box..
EDIT: sorry, the lap seems to be in a 2013 4 seater. The previous TG comparison to the AMG was in an early 2 seater
Getting back to the original question, please note what is 14 places above the Strad in the Top Gear lap times.........yep the old 2010 R8...........that too in damp conditions.
That's what I thought Phil- that they were seriously rapid.
I like that red one. Don't see many Porkers in Red for some reason.Must admit I have been looking at a Cayman S to replace the Spyder, fancy something a bit more hardcore sportscar and I don't want a 911.
This one ticks a lot of boxes
Cayman S - Guards Red
I've heard of two standard GTS that have shown over 500bhp on a rolling road in standard form. I have long suspected that my Strad pushed more out that they claim, it's certainly more powerful than my Gransport, which was 400 standard and mine had full Larinis, remap, filter etc so should have been 20-30bhp up or so. I believe that the quest to position Maserati below Ferrari in the many ways has contributed to a false output claim. Perhaps I should stick mine, and maybe Matt and Stuart could do the same, onto a rolling road and find out what the truth is.