Help Legal advice please

verdyrk10

New Member
Messages
9
Hi I was wondering if there was a legal expert on here that may be able to help me with a bit of a dilema?

My wife blew the turbo on her vehicle in October 2009, the AA were called and confirmed a blown turbo.
We have full AA cover which includes repairs upto the value of £500. The car was taken to my local garage and the turbo was removed and sent away to be repaired. In November I got a call from the garage to warn me that the turbo repair could be expensive as it was a difficult job, apparently?, my reply to them was that the vehicle was no use to me not running and the AA would be paying £500 of the bill. The turbo came back repaired eventualy at a cost of£950.00? and was fitted back on the vehicle, when the vehicle was started it apparently sounded horrendous, their diagnosis was internal engine damage caused by the turbo blowing, possibly valves etc so they would have to remove the head to check and if it was bent valves they would replace them. In trying to remove the head it was brought to my attention that the injectors were seized and could possibly be damaged? they then investigated the cost of the injectors, should they need to replace any, only to find out that they were £300 each? I was informed of this and my only reply, again, was that the vehicle is no use to me not running but this is getting crazy in costs as the vehicle was only worth £2500 to £3000. We are now into April. They then went ahead and removed the head and in doing so damaged 3 injectors so 3 new injectors were bought and various tests were done on the head etc and the car put back together, I assumed to be fixed, only to find they still hadn't solved the problem as it still ran badly. I by now had purchased another vehicle and had left the country until September which I had warned them I was doing. Since then I heard nothing. I returned in October and nievly put the vehicle to the back of my mind. Out of the blue this January, I get a message on my answer machine from the garage asking to call them, so I decided to cold call the garage to see them face to face and access the condition of the vehicle and why had they left it until now to contact me, it is left outside with 4 flat tyres and the bonnet placed over the engine looking rather sorry for itself.The reason I am asking all this is that the garage, since my visit, have now just sent me a bill a full 15 months after they had the vehicle, for £2234.77? for a non fixed vehicle.Unfortunately the owner was not there so I asked to get him to call me and thats when this bill turned up?
I obviously want to sort this as amicably as possible which is why I asked him to call me to discuss where we go from here, insted I get a bill for £2234 for a vehicle that does't work and I have no idea where I stand legaly or otherwise.
If anyone could help I would very much appreciate it.

Thanks
 

verdyrk10

New Member
Messages
9
Hi and thanks for responding. The vehicle is an old people carrier and I would rather not say where or who the garage is as its prob irrelevent.
 

Contigo

Sponsor
Messages
18,376
Is the AA cover a max of 500 quid per claim or per year? If it's per claim get on the AA and explain their predicament and have them send out an engineer to assess the car. If the other parts like injectors are covered (why wouldn't they be?) then they should honour everything else. Plus the other thing is that you should notify the garage that you will not be paying them until the vehicle is put back to it's original condition pre turbo blowing. Also tell them if they have carried out any work that you did not authorise. It's tilme to get royal on their arses!
 

verdyrk10

New Member
Messages
9
Hi, yes it is a max of £500 per claim but up to 5 claims a year? Could I claim the faulty turbo, as declared by the garage caused further issues eg noisy engine leading to head removal and injectors etc? they have already paid out for the turbo.
According to other sites I have posted on, a blown turbo will almost always lead to enjine problems, usualy bottom end tho not valves as the garage initialy thought? so I feel theres a bit of a case of poor diagnosis on there part.
In hind sight, personaly I think they should have looked at the mileage, the value, the nature of the breakdown, turbo failure leading to engine damage, and they should have just put a secondhand engine it.
I guess a tricky one.