Are you worried yet.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wattie

Member
Messages
8,640
Then, perhaps, it would have been best to read the whole report before you post what you did.

Enjoy your swim.
I wasn’t critiqueing the vaccine but I will now.

As you’ve mentioned it I think your assumption re the 44000 is wrong - thats the full sample size.
the 2 serious side effects should be measured as a % of only those that got the non-placebo. Otherwise the placebo dilutes the sample size.

So 2 out of 21720 given the vaccine developed serious side affects and one developed severe covid! 3 dodgy results.


Versus 3 serious cases of covid out of 21728 placebos.

Hardly reassuring is it.
 
Last edited:

Wack61

Member
Messages
8,807
It's the not discussed cost of the pandemic that concerns me

Listening to the radio yesterday, in March a guy of 26 went to hospital with pains in his legs , got misdiagnosed , sent away with antibiotics , they did nothing so he went back over and over in agony begging for an mri scan but due to covid it was a no

Eventually he was that bad they gave him a scan , one big tumor and lots of little ones in his legs

He's dead now , 27

How many times has that happened nationwide or worldwide , for what , to save 3% of the over 80s

And we're still doing it , although the takeup on lockdown two was much less than lockdown one and now the roads are busier than ever probably because all those on furlough are trying to find something to do.
 

rockits

Member
Messages
9,180
This is my worry too. I don't have the stats or data but am concerned we are doing more damage and causing.more issues than we are fixing. This is pretty much no less than suicide. Without that data it is hard to say but Covid doesn't seem a great risk or issue in the grand scheme of things when we know the likely risk now of catching Covid is not silly high also the likely risks of serious health issues or death is very low.

This could be the biggest fxck up of all proportions if we end up causing more preventable deaths than the preventable Covid deaths. An almighty great bill and costs for generations. We just don't have the data but it is certainly looking possible and generations of pain and suffering not even incl included.

Then if you add reductions in personal privacy and all the other stuff being rushed and forcibly introduced we could be paying for this in a massive way for a very long time.

I am concerned about this situation more than ever and it concerns me much more than Covid.
 

philw696

Member
Messages
25,611
I can't believe so many people still on furlough.
Spoke to a mechanic mate of mine who's off work from a large group of garages in Somerset.
Here in France we still have no Bars, Restaurants or Cafes open and still not sure when that will happen as they want the daily infection below 5,000 and I'm sure with the few relaxations we have again it will start going back up.
 

Phil H

Member
Messages
4,183
It's the not discussed cost of the pandemic that concerns me

Listening to the radio yesterday, in March a guy of 26 went to hospital with pains in his legs , got misdiagnosed , sent away with antibiotics , they did nothing so he went back over and over in agony begging for an mri scan but due to covid it was a no

Eventually he was that bad they gave him a scan , one big tumor and lots of little ones in his legs

He's dead now , 27

How many times has that happened nationwide or worldwide , for what , to save 3% of the over 80s

And we're still doing it , although the takeup on lockdown two was much less than lockdown one and now the roads are busier than ever probably because all those on furlough are trying to find something to do.
Covid: Cancer scan backlog raises late detection fears - BBC News

PH
 

Wack61

Member
Messages
8,807
they want the daily infection below 5,000 and I'm sure with the few relaxations we have again it will start going back up.

Whats the obsession with infection rates all about , it's deaths in the working population they should be focusing on
Until the 20th century it was survival of the fittest , advances in drugs and healthcare, better food,cleaner water have added 30 years to the average lifespan but surely you can't sacrifice the young who could be given a chance to survive with treatment over those kept alive with a cocktail of drugs

I really don't understand the thinking behind it at all , unless pensioners vote tory so keep them alive at all costs is the reasoning
 

CatmanV2

Member
Messages
48,885
Infections rates are used as a predictive measure for hospital admissions which lag about 2 weeks behind. Although most people that get it will not notice, or be a bit ill, the more people that are around with it, the more people will get it and therefore more people will get it badly....

So at a guess the brothers Grimm probably are ******** themselves with what's going to happen in January in hospitals

It's worth looking at the trends by age. Sub 50 is the least worrying bit, as long as they don't transmit it to the higher risk groups (like those of us that recognise condenser points), but sadly they will.

C
 

GeoffCapes

Member
Messages
14,000
I can't believe so many people still on furlough.

You are looking at most of the hospitality industry in the UK (those that haven't been made redundant already).

One client I spoke to the other day (very senior guy at Marriott) suggests that there are between 3 and 5 million of them still on furlough.
 

Wattie

Member
Messages
8,640
This is my worry too. I don't have the stats or data but am concerned we are doing more damage and causing.more issues than we are fixing. This is pretty much no less than suicide. Without that data it is hard to say but Covid doesn't seem a great risk or issue in the grand scheme of things when we know the likely risk now of catching Covid is not silly high also the likely risks of serious health issues or death is very low.

This could be the biggest fxck up of all proportions if we end up causing more preventable deaths than the preventable Covid deaths. An almighty great bill and costs for generations. We just don't have the data but it is certainly looking possible and generations of pain and suffering not even incl included.

Then if you add reductions in personal privacy and all the other stuff being rushed and forcibly introduced we could be paying for this in a massive way for a very long time.

I am concerned about this situation more than ever and it concerns me much more than Covid.
A very simple stat is to look at the tens of millions around the world who have lost their jobs.
Compare that with the dead, multiples higher.
 

Wattie

Member
Messages
8,640
Whats the obsession with infection rates all about , it's deaths in the working population they should be focusing on
Until the 20th century it was survival of the fittest , advances in drugs and healthcare, better food,cleaner water have added 30 years to the average lifespan but surely you can't sacrifice the young who could be given a chance to survive with treatment over those kept alive with a cocktail of drugs

I really don't understand the thinking behind it at all , unless pensioners vote tory so keep them alive at all costs is the reasoning
Common misconception.

The covid test was never designed to be used to test the “infectiousness” of an individual.
This is where it’s fecked.

The test provides a simple -ve or +ve for the virus.

someone who is +ve could have had the virus months ago and not even felt Ill.
The “cycling” of the test (see previous posts up to 45 times!!!!) can produce a +ve result meaning lockdown for them and all their contacts and as a result the population even though they are not infectious.

total fuckery and a totally flawed approach to the situation.
The tests don’t even reveal how many times they were cycled....why not?

A cycle +ve test of say 10 shows high levels of virus.
A cycle +ve test of 45 shows minute, non infectious levels.
Currently, both are banded as +ve and panic ensues.

if this current approach continues expect to be locked down for years.....or until they cunningly give the order to cycle the tests far less, making cases and the virus magically disappear as all those with minute levels disappear from results.
 
Last edited:

Phil the Brit

Member
Messages
1,499
It's the not discussed cost of the pandemic that concerns me

Listening to the radio yesterday, in March a guy of 26 went to hospital with pains in his legs , got misdiagnosed , sent away with antibiotics , they did nothing so he went back over and over in agony begging for an mri scan but due to covid it was a no

Eventually he was that bad they gave him a scan , one big tumor and lots of little ones in his legs

He's dead now , 27

How many times has that happened nationwide or worldwide , for what , to save 3% of the over 80s

And we're still doing it , although the takeup on lockdown two was much less than lockdown one and now the roads are busier than ever probably because all those on furlough are trying to find something to do.

Interesting you post about a guy with a pain in his legs. So have I and went to GP. He examined me, dismissed it when I said you could see my skin on left leg moving all on its own sometimes (like worms crawling under skin), pain in groin, pain in left bum under where big bone is, and difficulty getting comfortable when sitting or in bed. He sent me for xrays and blood tests. Phoned up a few days later and couldn't speak to him, only receptionist who told me tests all negative.
Well, four weeks later, I am still very uncorfortable a lot of the time and don't really know what to do.
Any good advice?
 

Scaf

Member
Messages
6,619
When are the “leaders” of the country going to stop moving the “kin goals posts.
Having reviewed the Tiers this week already, now they review them again and in my case bumping us into tier 3.
I now have to take down our outside “COVID safe” heated space ( no big deal really) but I can not imagine how restaurants etc can cope, not only with the restrictions placed upon them but the fact they change the rules two or three times in a week!.

*****
 

rockits

Member
Messages
9,180
It's the not discussed cost of the pandemic that concerns me

Listening to the radio yesterday, in March a guy of 26 went to hospital with pains in his legs , got misdiagnosed , sent away with antibiotics , they did nothing so he went back over and over in agony begging for an mri scan but due to covid it was a no

Eventually he was that bad they gave him a scan , one big tumor and lots of little ones in his legs

He's dead now , 27

How many times has that happened nationwide or worldwide , for what , to save 3% of the over 80s

And we're still doing it , although the takeup on lockdown two was much less than lockdown one and now the roads are busier than ever probably because all those on furlough are trying to find something to do.

I believe this is the case:

I am guessing only but there could be loads of reported or non reported cases like this. A direct consequence of UK Govt Covid decisions.
 

Rwc13

Member
Messages
1,668
A very simple stat is to look at the tens of millions around the world who have lost their jobs.
Compare that with the dead, multiples higher.
Although one is a rather more permanent state of affairs than the other..
 

Rwc13

Member
Messages
1,668
Interesting you post about a guy with a pain in his legs. So have I and went to GP. He examined me, dismissed it when I said you could see my skin on left leg moving all on its own sometimes (like worms crawling under skin), pain in groin, pain in left bum under where big bone is, and difficulty getting comfortable when sitting or in bed. He sent me for xrays and blood tests. Phoned up a few days later and couldn't speak to him, only receptionist who told me tests all negative.
Well, four weeks later, I am still very uncorfortable a lot of the time and don't really know what to do.
Any good advice?
Get an MRI scan. Pay for one privately if need me. An X-ray is next to useless if it is a lumbar or sacral nerve root problem. If you start getting pain in both legs, any kind of loss of sensation, particularly in the groin area, or start to have difficulty defecating or urinating, get yourself to A&E sharpish
 

Wack61

Member
Messages
8,807
Interesting you post about a guy with a pain in his legs. So have I and went to GP. He examined me, dismissed it when I said you could see my skin on left leg moving all on its own sometimes (like worms crawling under skin), pain in groin, pain in left bum under where big bone is, and difficulty getting comfortable when sitting or in bed. He sent me for xrays and blood tests. Phoned up a few days later and couldn't speak to him, only receptionist who told me tests all negative.
Well, four weeks later, I am still very uncorfortable a lot of the time and don't really know what to do.
Any good advice?

Sorry to hear that, other than pestering them there's not much else you can do

the show is on BBC Sounds, jeremy vine, yesterday ,37 minutes in , the tumors were on his lungs, big one in his pelvis


he features on this programme


 
Status
Not open for further replies.