As I said above.
I can only speak for myself and those in the cycling club I am a member of.
If you are a British Cycling registered club, then you have similar cover a car would, accidental damage, injury etc.
The clubs seem to be the ones getting the most stick and they're the ones who are the ones who comply with all that the angry motorist wants!
So now you want kids to have insurance for their bikes?
Do you realise how ridiculous your argument now sounds?
I think you missed the point Geoff
QUOTE="GeoffCapes, post: 908742, member: 3791"]
Most cyclists are also insured. No one pays road tax. It's an emissions tax now.
[/QUOTE]
Most cyclists are also insured ? Are they ****
My comment about kids bikes being insured was merely to demonstrate how far off the mark you quote that most cyclists are insured was.
Still if you want to back peddle and ignore the facts go ahead you have right of way no matter what the safest and sensible thing to do is.
What was ridiculous was your statement that MOST cyclists are insured which you based on not a hint of actual compiled data.
If you have any data available that shows most cyclists are insured then please share it.
I would of thought as a start to having all cyclists insured for the roads / 3rd party cover any new bikes sold should come with say 5 years insurance cover based on the frame number which also covers the bike if it is sold on.
That way even kids bikes can be covered as no doubt they will have a new bike within 5 years. Stolen bikes involved in crime / muggings and the like if less than 5 years old would also be covered.
Not a fool proof method but better than no insurance or 15% uptake of insurance at the moment.
The challenge would be making sure bikes older than 5 years old are insured and remain insured going forwards.
Ps. It was not my argument. I merely asked where you were getting your figures from. What i got was a ridiculous reply and no supporting figures.