105bhp! - but seriously , having driven both quite a bit. I agree with Adam. It’s just better- inside and out in every way. Build quality, tech etc. The only downside I think of the T - apart from its perception from the majority of Ferrari owners (over 60s, red trouser wearers, business and factory owners and lottery winners) is the noise.... the Turbo never sounds as good as NA even and any exhaust mods void the very expensive warranty.
The PF is on a different planet. 3.2 to 60, 35 more bhp than a 458. Looks like a mini F12. I have put my left kidney on EBay and am working out how to get the rest together.
150 by December... let’s set up an Xmas trip to dick lovetts!
Noted.
I have actually mate. The back seats are just big enough for the peritoneal dialysis bag- but if it leaked the leather would be ruined. My life expectancy would be based on both the 595bhp engine and my lack of blood filtering capacity.
I am happy to take responsibility! I almost got thrown out of the car by my wife on the motorway yesterday when we were discussing my next car. She was explaining most wives would allow this sort of thing. I calmly said - I wouldn’t allow a wife to have that sort of influence (in slightly more fruitful language). You can imagine where it went from there...
It’s a race to see which can depreciate the fastest - the DBS or the Portofino. First to 150k wins. Shall we go early December
Those are definitely my favourite 2 at the moment. Although I have been watching lots of reviews of the F12...
I’d have one in a heart beat
I do like them but the 4 seats in the PF and the sliding glass rear window in the 458 spider are playing on my mind...I need a car I keep for at least 2 years this time!
Who would ever do that...that wholly depends on whether you already own one from new
F12,458, PF, Hurucan, DBS
