Hi,
There are obviously lots of different views on financing, and what makes sense for one may be different for others.
It’s almost certainly hypothetical now anyway, as I’m no longer interested in the car I was looking at, but given that I’ve already shared the inner workings of my personal man maths calculator with you all in an attempt to learn from other’s perspectives, here’s some more ramblings.....
I’ve historically been completely debt averse, and other than my mortgage have zero borrowings. I also am fortunate enough to have a decent chunk of equity in my house, as my mortgage is only about a 1/3rd of the house value. As such, I probably could, very easily, increase my mortgage by the extra 40k. I could also, theoretically, pay this off within two years, as I currently have an interest only mortgage, fixed at just under 2%, where I can (and do) pay 10% of the capital off in a lump sum per year. However, this would still mean that there was an extra 40k on the mortgage for at least the next 3 years, which is when my current fix runs out.
So adding the car purchase to my mortgage would cost me 2% per year for the next three years, which (if borrowing 40k) is £2400. This assumes I’m able to completely remove the £40k in 3 years time...
Alternatively, if I bought the car on finance, and let’s assume I could get 5.9% over the same three year period, that would be £7,080. So a difference of £4,680....
That adds up to the price of a new clutch, so why wouldn’t I go the mortgage route?