Epstein

MarkMas

Chief pedant
Messages
8,796
On the subject of conspiracy theories what do you make of this?
It received absolutely NO media coverage anywhere.....not a toot, in fact I bet you didn’t hear of it.

These are America’s finest, 100% hero’s aren’t they, pillars of society and brave, brave men.

They now claim there is “overwhelming evidence” that “pre-planted explosives . . . caused the destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings.”


It is SO tiring to keep having to debunk this sort of nonsense.

The Fire Commissioners of the Franklin Square Munson Fire Department are not "America's finest" and "brave, brave men" they are elected (men and women), who are the Supervisory Board of a small volunteer fire department, of about 50 people. Most Some of them have no experience at all of firefighting (although the Chairman is a retired volunteer firefighter) and are certainly not experts on forensic fire investigation. The actual fire department that these idiots supervise has already dissociated itself from the ill-informed and insane speculations of its Board.

https://www.metabunk.org/franklin-s...of-fire-commissioners-9-11-resolution.t10842/
 
Last edited:

Wattie

Member
Messages
8,640
He explained that in the interview, he remembered BECAUSE it was his daughters birthday AND it was so unusual.
Please don't create something suspect when it isn't.
Well his memory wasn’t that good on that either.
P
“I’ve never been . . . I’ve only been to Woking a couple of times and I remember it weirdly distinctly. As soon as somebody reminded me of it, I went, ‘Oh yes I remember that’.”

He was reminded of it, mmmmn and then he remembered it.... distinctly.

That distinct he had to be reminded about it.
 
Messages
6,001
His interview was on in the pub last night for about an hour.
The sound was either not on or he was drowned out. I watched for a while looking at his facial expressions.
I thought 2 things
  1. he was lying
  2. what a good way it is to watch tv!
 

steve3200

Junior Member
Messages
87
On the subject of conspiracy theories what do you make of this?
It received absolutely NO media coverage anywhere.....not a toot, in fact I bet you didn’t hear of it.

These are America’s finest, 100% hero’s aren’t they, pillars of society and brave, brave men.

They now claim there is “overwhelming evidence” that “pre-planted explosives . . . caused the destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings.”


with about 60,000 litres of aviation fuel being slammed into each tower I'm amazed they didn't collapse earlier, sorry but the pre-planted explosives theory is daft.
 

Wattie

Member
Messages
8,640
Apparently the Palace have refused to give details of the medical condition suffered by PA after the war but presumably its known as “sweating bullets” syndrome.
I would suggest that after the interview he will be suffering from “sh1tting bricks” syndrome as he can expect a call from the FBI at some point......or an appearance in court involving a private lawsuit.
 
Last edited:

midlifecrisis

Member
Messages
16,102
Apparently the Palace have refused to give details of the medical condition suffered by PA after the war but presumably is known as “sweating bullets” syndrome.
I would suggest that after the interview he will be suffering from “sh1tting bricks” syndrome as he can expect a call from the FBI at some point......or an appearance in court involving a private lawsuit.
If a wife of an American soldier can get away with manslaughter of a British man then Andy can get away with 'knowing' Epstein.
 

Wattie

Member
Messages
8,640
If a wife of an American soldier can get away with manslaughter of a British man then Andy can get away with 'knowing' Epstein.
But isn’t this the odd thing. She was clearly at fault and it’s a legal disgrace.

Prince Andrew isn’t in the wrong for knowing someone- he’s been accused by an individual (2 actually) of sleeping with her when she was underage.
He on the other hand claims he is innocent, never met her, no recollection at all of anything, not even the photo, didn’t happen, zilch. Nada.
This statement alone means that the picture above is “fake” as you can’t be photographed with someone you have never met. He should have categorically stated the picture was faked.....but he didn’t.

In fact - he also claims he Has an alibi!

So why isn’t one of the most identified and powerful men on the planet whose reputation is being tarnished and sullied not taking legal action against his accusers for damages for such as he is 100% innocent.
He’s access to the best lawyers and unlimited funding.
Why is he on the back foot, “sinking in quicksand”, if he is 100% innocent?
 
Last edited:

CatmanV2

Member
Messages
48,557
You're conflating things.

Not remembering doesn't mean it didn't happen and AFAI the photo wasn't taken on the same day.

C
 

Vampyrebat

Member
Messages
3,117
A lie detector test should be offered to him I think to establish.

If he is prepared to take one.
If so, the outcome.

I would sit down with some popcorn to watch that!
 

MarkMas

Chief pedant
Messages
8,796
A lie detector test should be offered to him I think to establish.

If he is prepared to take one.
If so, the outcome.

I would sit down with some popcorn to watch that!

It is a popular myth that lie detector tests are effective.
From Wikipedia: "Despite claims of 90% validity by polygraph advocates, the National Research Council has found no evidence of effectiveness. In particular, studies have indicated that the relevant–irrelevant questioning technique is not ideal, as many innocent subjects exert a heightened physiological reaction to the crime-relevant questions. The American Psychological Association states "Most psychologists agree that there is little evidence that polygraph tests can accurately detect lies."