That statement is very “smart” or you’re really just missing my point...
I was merely calling the double exposure to both the underlying asset (gold) AND the currency (gbp) if un-hedged, which you had failed to point out.
Re-read your original post, if you truly have been a professional investor for 35years, you will understand that it was incomplete and therefore incorrect. If you don’t see that, it might be time for you to retire from the financial industry (unless you are happy to fund other traders’ profits )[/QUOTE
If you’re referring to
“She isnt that clever.
Now we're trying to dress incompetence up as "cunning logic" and yes I do think that she and her advisers are that stupid.
Look at the deal, look at the legal advice, look at everything they've botched and look at all the resignations from those advising her.
I'm not sure they had a ******* plan A, let alone a plan B!!!
Oh and i'm no JC supporter but i dont believe at this point it could get any worse than the shambles we are witnessing.
Re Sterling hedges as it's tanking and will do until the uncertainty subsides you may wanna think about Gold...done very well since the exit vote”
Then you”ll note the “you may” aspect. It wasn’t anymore than an investment suggestion.
As such, it didn’t cover any technicalities or risk/reward analysis, nor suitability for investors nor did it have to. That is for individuals to asses on their own.
Indeed, I didn’t suggest it was the only solution.
With your “If we go WTO terms, watch the trade deficit due to import tariffs, GBP collapse etc” I stand by my “you may wanna think about Gold...done very well since the exit vote” as one way investors may protect themeselves from a gbp collapse.
Seems I’m not alone in this thinking
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...urs-u-k-investors-to-buy-gold-royal-mint-says
https://international-adviser.com/massive-324-surge-in-gold-demand-ahead-of-brexit-vote/