Well that’s not strictly correct.
I quoted a post on the 1 Feb that suggested the following
With what I read, I thought the post was a blasé comment and therefore unhelpful.
To suggest something wasn’t dangerous, imo was inaccurate. From what I’d read, my view was it clearly was dangerous. (Indeed suggestions it couldnt be spread by sneezing etc were subsequently inaccurate)
That initial concern prompted some private pms between forum members, whom I respect and who have more experience and knowledge of such viruses than I do. That said, i’m My own man and I make my own mind up.
14000 cases then, 43000 cases now...if the data is correct! Uk infiltration....warnings from the WHO, warnings of seriousness from UK Govt.
Others maybe correct and I hope they are, till then I’ll wear a condom.
The scientific data isn’t helping their point. This is a clearly a dangerous virus that isn’t contained and it’s killing more and more that we know of!
Oh and by the way, no-one in 11 days hasn’t proved it’s not an escaped bio-weapon, maybe that’s why 400,000,000 are locked down for 1000 deaths.
China’s government stood silent Monday in the face of growing scientific reports that the source of the deadly Wuhan virus outbreak did not originate solely from a seafood market in the city.
www.washingtontimes.com
View attachment 65483