Jaguar Jaguar F-Type SVR for the day

Contigo

Sponsor
Messages
18,376
Had the pleasure of spending most of yesterday in a 18 plate F-type SVR.

38904526_668934170157717_6023076752237002752_o.jpg



38888194_668934346824366_2731500944289169408_o.jpg




First impressions on aesthetics were impressive if not a little ripspeed on the new active aero rear carbon spoiler but it's nice to know you can spec the smaller fixed wing if this is not for you. The front apron is huge and the bonnet extremely long which is not surprising based on the E-type proportions and the fact there is a 5.0 Supercharged V8 shoehorned into that area. The car we test drove was in a special order hue specced by the dealer after a visit to SVO. Apparently everything and anything can be added to these cars including stitching and even sticker packs (why?). It's all a little bit crass on a car like this but I guess at this price range (£110k new but £75k used) it can attract the rice boy types.

Jumping in and firing up the V8 via the usual starter button which barks into life is a nice experience although with the high sills I don't think jumping in is something any of us would be doing, it's more of a pantomime. The interior is well layed out but not sure why they chose to stop the Alcantara mid way around the centre console and dash top. You'll see in the video what I mean and as you move lower in the cabin the quality of the fixtures and fittings really does start to deteriorate, especially around the sills and door bottoms. The soundtrack with the exhaust valves open sounds a little too contrived for my liking and just start to tire after an hour or so. It's not so much the deep soundtrack but the overrun forced sounds that are clearly written into the map.

Once out on the open road (think B roads as a first test) it hunkers down well and the power is instantaneous, really this car is up there with some of the supercars we have driven (458, 12C, Gallardo etc) and it pulls so quickly through the rev range with almost no whine from the vortex supercharger. The money that has been investing in the design of the car has mostly been spent on Aero (carbon knuckles, Active Aero spoiler) and it grips well with huge downforces. Pushing on though in the twisties and under hard braking the car is very unsettled. I'm not sure if this is down to Torque Vector braking but somehow the car seems to be constantly adjusting itself in the corners and after driving the car I read an EVO Magazine review and that was also mentioned by Dan Prosser after his test drive. The car will hang on once it has settled into the corner but it just feels very fidgety and unpredictable which isn't ideal in a car with 575 bhp. The only way I could break traction was by disabling DSC completely and giving it a boot full in first gear exiting a roundabout and only then was there any over steer. The SVR is an AWD car but predominantly uses the rear wheels until slip occurs and then it diverts power to the front wheels. You can feel this even in Dynamic mode as it pushes the car towards under-steer!

Negatives out of the way the SVR is a great daily and a real head turner and will offer some serious thrills at a very good price point. Here's a video too.


 

hoyin

Member
Messages
1,842
Nice review.

I like the way the bonnet opens. And I like the fact that Jag have made this car.

I agree with you that the noise is too forced and fake for me.

Not one for me thanks. I’d rather have an R8 given the choice as a comparable car.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

hashluck

Member
Messages
1,521
This is coming from a Jaguar fan and I still own 2 of them which I love but....

Too much fakeness all round on this car for me (and the entire F-Type range is flawed in my opinion). Sadly we are also seeing 3 year old F-Types with rusty subframes and Jaguar are indifferent to it. Sadly also Jaguar also seem indifferent to properly replacing the XK which, whilst built to a price, was sublime in comparison. Jaguars have never needed to shout and the F-Type doth protest too much in my opinion. I never had an easier decision in my life when comparing the V8 F-Type to a Vantage several years ago. Get over the tech issues and a Maserati Granturismo MC-Shift is a much. much nicer place to spend time as is a Gransport come to that which is probably closer in character to the F-Type and shows we are taking many a backward step and precious few forward in this new world of legislation and emissions requirements etc, and the perceived marketing need for a car to have a gawping grille and announce its arrival in order to appeal to the masses. Happy Sunday all :)
 

Contigo

Sponsor
Messages
18,376
Jumping back into the GTS after returning the SVR was the best part of the day. No fancy trickery to keep you on the road just pure mechanical steering a decent traction system and the sound was far better. £30k vs £110k hmmmmm . It’s made my next car choice definite now....
 

Contigo

Sponsor
Messages
18,376
To add to this the performance of the SVR is really huge, We had it in Vmax mode where the Spoiler is stowed and all power from the engine is unleashed (some say over 600bhp) so that the car can reach over 200mph and we timed a 0-60 run at just over 3 seconds!!!! That's into Lambo Huracan territory and potentially even faster.
 

outrun

Member
Messages
5,017
I had the v6 S version for the weekend and really liked it. The v8, especially in SVR form here, does nothing for me as it's just trying too hard with aero and silly add on bits and pieces. The S sounds great, has ample power for most and is reasonably priced (for a 2/3 year old one). It's a shame they've stuck a 2.0 in there as well to chase sales. A nice, S in silver or grey with larger wheels than standard and the centre exhausts is a nice nice thing.
 

azapa

Member
Messages
1,300
The E type being one of my all time favourite cars - just so beautiful - I really wanted to like these. But just can't. Seems cheap and contrived.
 

Andyk

Member
Messages
61,126
One of the best looking cars on the road for me....as well as the old Vantge and GT S of course. I had a 400 Sport for a day and it was a cracking car. Probably the best of the bunch as the 400 bhp suited the car as it was better balanced than the V8. A great everyday companion. The amount of comments from the public about how good it looked and sounded I lost count in the day.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    882.6 KB · Views: 14
  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    855.9 KB · Views: 14

CliveP1

Junior Member
Messages
578
Love the look, went and tried one but alas no headroom for me with the seat all the way down just not enough room. Shame.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
 

alfatwo

Member
Messages
5,517
Lucky you only had it for one day! that chest wig would be frowned upon in our village

Elegant Maserati's on the other hand are warmly welcome:cool:

Dave
 

Felonious Crud

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
21,141
My choice was between an SVR and the V12 Vantage S. The tendency for Jags to depreciate like rocks off cliffs is one of the factors which steered me towards the Aston. The fact that you can buy a 2-year old SVR for a shade over £70k when it listed at over £110k new confirms that these cars follow the trend.

Certainly all the reviews I read on the SVR were really good, but I suspect the better car would be a V6S with a stack of options which has already endured its first three years of depreciation.
 

Contigo

Sponsor
Messages
18,376
Love the look, went and tried one but alas no headroom for me with the seat all the way down just not enough room. Shame.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

I’m 6ft 3-4 and Adam (in the video) is taller so you must be a giant to not fit.
 

Andyk

Member
Messages
61,126
The V6 S is a better balanced car then the V8 .... buy a V6S for around 36 to 40k and get some tasty upgrades from Dave Appleby who will take you from 385 bhp to around a much more healthy 450bhp for 2k and you still have that balance.
 

Andyk

Member
Messages
61,126
I wonder if the AWD effects the fun element Phil. I know it's not as hindering as a full 4WD but does intervene. Think that's why I also prefer the RWD S....The 400 Sport was brilliant as an everyday sports car but most were ordered as AWD and RDW yet most of the Convertible 400 Sports were ordered as RWD. Find that odd. Do you need AWD in a 400 BHP sports car ?
 

Contigo

Sponsor
Messages
18,376
No they added it to the SVR as lots of R's were written off/pranged and you just couldn't put the power down properly.