Pic of the day

philw696

Member
Messages
25,491
THE BRUTAL AMERICAN 20-LITRE V-4 FRONT WHEEL DRIVE CHRISTIE RACING CAR OF 1907
The most spectacular and brutal car Christie ever built was definitely the V-4 racer of 1907. It had an engine that housed an astonishing 20 liters (1,214 cubic inches), mounted transversely, the crankshaft taking the place of the front axle! It was a completely new design, specially built for the 1907 racing season and using no parts from previous racers. The immense engine had a bore and stroke of 184 x 184 mm (7 1/4 inch square) and 8 atmospheric inlet valves per cylinder and just one mechanically opened overhead exhaust valve. The transverse mounted engine employed crankshaft mounted spur gears and telescopic U-joints on each end to drive the front wheels, originally through a transmission arrangement that featured dangerously exposed gears. Later this was changed, to make it better suited for high-speed racing.FB_IMG_1712142236091.jpg
 

safrane

Member
Messages
16,884
THE BRUTAL AMERICAN 20-LITRE V-4 FRONT WHEEL DRIVE CHRISTIE RACING CAR OF 1907
The most spectacular and brutal car Christie ever built was definitely the V-4 racer of 1907. It had an engine that housed an astonishing 20 liters (1,214 cubic inches), mounted transversely, the crankshaft taking the place of the front axle! It was a completely new design, specially built for the 1907 racing season and using no parts from previous racers. The immense engine had a bore and stroke of 184 x 184 mm (7 1/4 inch square) and 8 atmospheric inlet valves per cylinder and just one mechanically opened overhead exhaust valve. The transverse mounted engine employed crankshaft mounted spur gears and telescopic U-joints on each end to drive the front wheels, originally through a transmission arrangement that featured dangerously exposed gears. Later this was changed, to make it better suited for high-speed racing.View attachment 125068
I suspect it understeered a tad!
 

TimR

Member
Messages
2,731
There were a lot of Sports Saloons from this era that looked great even from humble makes like Singer, Riley, MG etc. Every time I see one I get an itch for a really old car but this is a different era and not sure suited to the modern world
Yeah…I’d have one. They aren’t cheap though….A very different ownership experience for some for sure. WHO needs the modern world anyway…?
. But anyone with mechanical sympathy and a real interest would be fine. Of course, where & what sort of use you out it to may seriously affect that. But I see folk rallying them, trials driving up hill * dale in mud galore…!.That one barely moved when I knew it. A completely restored car , not a survivor then..
Looks great. I wonder how I always managed to overlook it in favor of the rag top tourer. Blind blind blind…..lol
That rear bumper though.. US ain’t got nothing on it…?
 

joered

Member
Messages
440
There were a lot of Sports Saloons from this era that looked great even from humble makes like Singer, Riley, MG etc. Every time I see one I get an itch for a really old car but this is a different era and not sure suited to the modern world
I suppose it depends how far back you would want to go.Era of SS jag ,Alvis etc? Or XK150 jag, Lagonda? MGA 1500 or TR3A were always cars i have considered good looking motors.
As mentioned in other posts you need space to work on old cars, and you need to be fit!
 

Guy

Member
Messages
2,150
127234863_3429553733780608_5323581637787526677_n.jpg